The infertility of many couples rests on an enigmatic dysfunction of the man’s sperm. To gain insight into the underlying pathomechanisms, we assessed the function of the sperm-specific multisubunit CatSper-channel complex in the sperm of almost 2,300 men undergoing a fertility workup, using a simple motility-based test. We identified a group of men with normal semen parameters but defective CatSper function. These men or couples failed to conceive naturally and upon medically assisted reproduction via intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was, ultimately, required to conceive a child. We revealed that the defective CatSper function was caused by variations in CATSPER genes. Moreover, we unveiled that CatSper-deficient human sperm were unable to undergo hyperactive motility and, therefore, failed to penetrate the egg coat. Thus, our study provides the experimental evidence that sperm hyperactivation is required for human fertilization, explaining the infertility of CatSper-deficient men and the need of ICSI for medically assisted reproduction. Finally, our study also revealed that defective CatSper function and ensuing failure to hyperactivate represents the most common cause of unexplained male infertility known thus far and that this sperm channelopathy can readily be diagnosed, enabling future evidence-based treatment of affected couples.
Samuel Young, Christian Schiffer, Alice Wagner, Jannika Patz, Anton Potapenko, Leonie Herrmann, Verena Nordhoff, Tim Pock, Claudia Krallmann, Birgit Stallmeyer, Albrecht Röpke, Michelina Kierzek, Cristina Biagioni, Tao Wang, Lars Haalck, Dirk Deuster, Jan N. Hansen, Dagmar Wachten, Benjamin Risse, Hermann M. Behre, Stefan Schlatt, Sabine Kliesch, Frank Tüttelmann, Christoph Brenker, Timo Strünker
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through May 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 3,828 | 394 |
703 | 123 | |
Figure | 516 | 1 |
Table | 81 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 400 | 22 |
Citation downloads | 76 | 0 |
Totals | 5,604 | 540 |
Total Views | 6,144 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.