Selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine unloads the left ventricle in heart failure patients

JC Reil, JC Tardif, I Ford, SM Lloyd, E O'Meara… - Journal of the American …, 2013 - jacc.org
JC Reil, JC Tardif, I Ford, SM Lloyd, E O'Meara, M Komajda, JS Borer, L Tavazzi…
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013jacc.org
Objectives: The study aimed to determine whether isolated heart rate (HR) reduction with
ivabradine reduces afterload of patients with systolic heart failure. Background: The effective
arterial elastance (Ea) represents resistive and pulsatile afterload of the heart derived from
the pressure volume relation. HR modulates Ea, and, therefore, afterload burden. Methods:
Among the patients with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction≤ 35%) randomized to either
placebo or ivabradine in the SHIFT (Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the If Inhibitor …
Objectives
The study aimed to determine whether isolated heart rate (HR) reduction with ivabradine reduces afterload of patients with systolic heart failure.
Background
The effective arterial elastance (Ea) represents resistive and pulsatile afterload of the heart derived from the pressure volume relation. HR modulates Ea, and, therefore, afterload burden.
Methods
Among the patients with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction ≤35%) randomized to either placebo or ivabradine in the SHIFT (Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial), 275 patients (n = 132, placebo; n = 143, ivabradine 7.5 mg twice a day) were included in the echocardiographic substudy. Ea, total arterial compliance (TAC), and end-systolic elastance (Ees) were calculated at baseline and after 8 months of treatment. Blood pressure was measured by arm cuff; stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction, and end-diastolic volume were assessed by echocardiography.
Results
At baseline Ea, TAC, HR, and Ees did not differ significantly between ivabradine- and placebo-treated patients. After 8 months of treatment, HR was significantly reduced in the ivabradine group (p < 0.0001) and was accompanied by marked reduction in Ea (p < 0.0001) and improved TAC (p = 0.004) compared with placebo. Although contractility remained unchanged, ventricular-arterial coupling was markedly improved (p = 0.002), resulting in a higher SV (p < 0.0001) in the ivabradine-treated patients.
Conclusions
Isolated HR reduction by ivabradine improves TAC, thus reducing Ea. Because Ees is unaltered, improved ventricular-arterial coupling is responsible for increased SV. Therefore, unloading of the heart may contribute to the beneficial effect of isolated HR reduction in patients with systolic heart failure. (Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial [SHIFT]; ISRCTN70429960)
jacc.org