[HTML][HTML] Real-world use of ivacaftor in Canada: a retrospective analysis using the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry

CR Kawala, X Ma, J Sykes, S Stanojevic, A Coriati… - Journal of Cystic …, 2021 - Elsevier
CR Kawala, X Ma, J Sykes, S Stanojevic, A Coriati, AL Stephenson
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2021Elsevier
Background: Ivacaftor is a CFTR potentiator with demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and
has been rapidly adopted within the CF community. Given the uptake of ivacaftor in eligible
people, identifying a comparator group not on modulators to measure effectiveness is
difficult. We evaluated health outcomes in individuals with G551D and non-G551D
genotypes on ivacaftor using real-world longitudinal data. Methods: This population-based
observational study compared clinical trajectories pre-post ivacaftor using the Canadian CF …
Background
: Ivacaftor is a CFTR potentiator with demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and has been rapidly adopted within the CF community. Given the uptake of ivacaftor in eligible people, identifying a comparator group not on modulators to measure effectiveness is difficult. We evaluated health outcomes in individuals with G551D and non-G551D genotypes on ivacaftor using real-world longitudinal data.
Methods
: This population-based observational study compared clinical trajectories pre-post ivacaftor using the Canadian CF Registry from 2006 to 01–01 through 2018–12–31. Piece-wise linear mixed-effects models were used to compare lung function, nutritional status, pulmonary exacerbations, and Pseudomonas colonization pre- and post-ivacaftor. Multivariable models were used to adjust for confounding factors.
Results
: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased significantly by 5.7 percent predicted (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9, 7.5; p<0.001) after initiation of ivacaftor. FEV1 decline rate was attenuated to -0.30% (95% CI -0.9, 0.29; p = 0.32) predicted/year post-ivacaftor, compared with -0.75% (95% CI -1.12, -0.37; p<0.001) predicted/year pre-ivacaftor, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. BMI percentiles also increased post-ivacaftor (6.57 percentiles, 95% CI 3.91, 9.24; p<0.001). Pulmonary exacerbations showed a nonsignificant reduction of 18% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61, 1.11; p = 0.19) and the odds of a positive sputum culture for Pseudomonas aeruginosa decreased in the post-ivacaftor period (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.30, 0.63; p<0.001).
Conclusions
: This real-world, observational study demonstrated improvement in health outcomes in a broad population of people with CF. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of ivacaftor on quality of life and survival.
Elsevier